Moment guide · FY 2026-27
I own two houses — one is sitting empty
Do I have to pay tax on the second house even if I don't rent it out?
Yes — if you own more than one property, you can designate only ONE as self-occupied (zero annual value). All others are deemed let-out at notional rent, even if actually vacant. The upside: no interest cap on the deemed let-out property, so a heavily-mortgaged second home can generate a tax loss that offsets your salary income up to ₹2L/year.
Your legitimate options
Every route the statute actually gives you — with its condition, cap and deadline.
| Route | Condition | Cap / deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Self-occupied exemption — pick one property | Only ONE property can be self-occupied (nil annual value) | All additional properties are deemed let-out — subject to notional rent regardless of actual vacancy |
| Deemed let-out — second empty property | Property vacant but you own it | Notional rent = higher of fair rent and municipal value; 30% SD allowed; full loan interest allowed |
| Strategic: declare loan-heavy property as deemed let-out | One property has large loan, other is loan-free | No interest cap on let-out property; maximises interest deduction vs ₹2L cap on self-occupied |
| Loss set-off and carry forward | Deemed let-out income is negative after interest | Set off against other income (salary) up to ₹2L/year (s.71(3A)); carry forward 8 years |
The #1 trap
The ₹2L annual interest cap (s.24(b)) applies only to self-occupied property — the deemed let-out property has NO interest cap, making it strategic to allocate the heavily-mortgaged property as let-out.
The decision path
Follow it top to bottom — the first condition that matches is your answer.
Worked example
Ashwin, 42, owns two flats — one in Chennai (self-occupied), one in Hyderabad (vacant)
Ashwin owns two flats. Chennai flat: self-occupied, home loan at ₹60k/month EMI (₹1.5L interest in FY 2026-27). Hyderabad flat: vacant (second home), home loan at ₹45k/month EMI (₹4.2L interest in FY 2026-27). Municipal value (Hyderabad) = ₹2.4L. Fair rent = ₹2.8L. He designates Chennai as self-occupied (annual value = nil). He cannot claim more than ₹2L interest on it. Hyderabad is deemed let-out. Annual value = fair rent = ₹2.8L (higher of fair rent/municipal value). Municipal taxes paid = ₹0 (assumed nil). 30% standard deduction = ₹84,000. Net of deductions before interest = ₹2.8L - ₹84k = ₹1.96L. Minus interest = ₹4.2L. Net income from Hyderabad = ₹1.96L - ₹4.2L = -₹2.24L (loss). Set-off: ₹2L of this loss can be set off against his salary of ₹18L. Net taxable salary = ₹16L. Remaining ₹24k loss carries forward to next year. Total interest benefit: ₹2L (Chennai self-occ cap) + ₹4.2L (Hyderabad no cap) = ₹6.2L interest deducted across both houses. Without this strategy (declaring Chennai as self-occ), he would only get ₹2L cap on one house. Strategy saves him ₹4.2L extra deduction = ₹1.26L tax at 30%. A quick call with us dials in the final figure.
Questions people actually ask
Sections: 22, 23(1), 23(4), 71(3A) · Last verified 2026-08-11 · Reviewed by Harun Raaj & Associates, Chartered Accountants. Every figure cites the Income-tax Act, 1961 (with ITA 2025 mapping via our section index).